SUBMIT TO FLOG
  • 🔍SEARCH
  • WEEK 01: THE FUTURE OF NOW, YESTERDAY
    • ISSUE 01: DO MACHINES HAVE ORGASMS?
    • ISSUE 02: THE MELBOURNE UGLINESS
    • ISSUE 03: WELCOME CLASS...
  • WEEK 02: STRAWMAN
    • ISSUE 04: A THESIS ON THE OPERATION OF ROTATION IN HIMSELF'S LIBRARY WITHIN THE POST-NUMERICAL CULTURE OF LATE-CAPITALIST SOCIETY
    • ISSUE 05: HOW TO TALK DIRTY WITHOUT FEELING RIDICULOUS
    • ISSUE 06: PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT
  • WEEK 03: SORRY, NOT SORRY
    • ISSUE 07: KNOW [YOUR] PLACE
    • ISSUE 08: AFTER JUNKSPACE
    • ISSUE 09: WHERE AM 'I'?
    • ISSUE 10: THE BENEFACTOR
  • WEEK 04: THE BODY POLITIC PART i
    • ISSUE 11: LET'S GET CRITICAL
    • ISSUE 12: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ ANTHONY IP
    • ISSUE 13: BODY POLITICS
  • WEEK 05: THE BODY POLITIC PART ii
    • ISSUE 14: THE TOWER PROJECT OR "THIS ARCHITECTURE WHICH IS NOT ONE"
    • ISSUE 15: MOVE TO BEIJING...NOW!
    • ISSUE 16: NO MORE MASTERS
  • WEEK 06: CIVIL/UNCIVIL
    • ISSUE 17: SMILE TO YOUR BAD LUCK
    • ISSUE 18: #MAKE IT YOURS
    • ISSUE 19: HI ROBERT
    • ISSUE 20: ON SPRINGVALE
    • ISSUE 21: MELTING POT
  • WEEK 07: HAUNTED
    • ISSUE 22: STONE TAPE
    • ISSUE 23: WELCOME TO RINGWOOD
    • ISSUE 24: RECIPE FOR A MALL OF REMEMBRANCE
  • WEEK 08: THE THIN LINE
    • ISSUE 25: FWD FWD FWD
    • ISSUE 26: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ PAUL VAN HERK
    • ISSUE 27: ONE+
    • ISSUE 28: A FOR ARCHITECTURE
    • ISSUE 29: ETUDE TO MEDIOCRACY
  • WEEK 09: C IS FOR C***CAT
    • ISSUE 30: GO SELF YOUR SELF
    • ISSUE 31: AUTHENTICITY NOW; BUILD + EAT
    • ISSUE 32-34: CONGRATULATIONS
  • WEEK 10: MISSING FROM THE CANON
    • ISSUE 35: ON READING & WRITING: MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS
    • ISSUE 36: MERCHANT BUILDERS/CLAIRE SCORPO
    • ISSUE 37: BEVERLEY HILLS - HOWARD RATCLIFFE LAWSON "THE ARCHITECT WHO BUILDS"
  • WEEK 11: DETAIL - NAKED AND NAUGHTY
    • ISSUE 38: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ DHARMAN GERSCH
    • ISSUE 39-40: REVENGE ON RED TAPE
    • ISSUE 41: RED TAPE LETTER
  • WEEK 12: DIY LEMONS
    • ISSUE 42-44: #BRUTALIST FILTER
    • ISSUE 45: SHOP THE CITY
    • ISSUE 46: WE CAN BE MORE THAN FRIENDS
  • LOST AND FOUND
  • ANTIFLOG
  • BUYFLOG
  • 🔍SEARCH
  • WEEK 01: THE FUTURE OF NOW, YESTERDAY
    • ISSUE 01: DO MACHINES HAVE ORGASMS?
    • ISSUE 02: THE MELBOURNE UGLINESS
    • ISSUE 03: WELCOME CLASS...
  • WEEK 02: STRAWMAN
    • ISSUE 04: A THESIS ON THE OPERATION OF ROTATION IN HIMSELF'S LIBRARY WITHIN THE POST-NUMERICAL CULTURE OF LATE-CAPITALIST SOCIETY
    • ISSUE 05: HOW TO TALK DIRTY WITHOUT FEELING RIDICULOUS
    • ISSUE 06: PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT
  • WEEK 03: SORRY, NOT SORRY
    • ISSUE 07: KNOW [YOUR] PLACE
    • ISSUE 08: AFTER JUNKSPACE
    • ISSUE 09: WHERE AM 'I'?
    • ISSUE 10: THE BENEFACTOR
  • WEEK 04: THE BODY POLITIC PART i
    • ISSUE 11: LET'S GET CRITICAL
    • ISSUE 12: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ ANTHONY IP
    • ISSUE 13: BODY POLITICS
  • WEEK 05: THE BODY POLITIC PART ii
    • ISSUE 14: THE TOWER PROJECT OR "THIS ARCHITECTURE WHICH IS NOT ONE"
    • ISSUE 15: MOVE TO BEIJING...NOW!
    • ISSUE 16: NO MORE MASTERS
  • WEEK 06: CIVIL/UNCIVIL
    • ISSUE 17: SMILE TO YOUR BAD LUCK
    • ISSUE 18: #MAKE IT YOURS
    • ISSUE 19: HI ROBERT
    • ISSUE 20: ON SPRINGVALE
    • ISSUE 21: MELTING POT
  • WEEK 07: HAUNTED
    • ISSUE 22: STONE TAPE
    • ISSUE 23: WELCOME TO RINGWOOD
    • ISSUE 24: RECIPE FOR A MALL OF REMEMBRANCE
  • WEEK 08: THE THIN LINE
    • ISSUE 25: FWD FWD FWD
    • ISSUE 26: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ PAUL VAN HERK
    • ISSUE 27: ONE+
    • ISSUE 28: A FOR ARCHITECTURE
    • ISSUE 29: ETUDE TO MEDIOCRACY
  • WEEK 09: C IS FOR C***CAT
    • ISSUE 30: GO SELF YOUR SELF
    • ISSUE 31: AUTHENTICITY NOW; BUILD + EAT
    • ISSUE 32-34: CONGRATULATIONS
  • WEEK 10: MISSING FROM THE CANON
    • ISSUE 35: ON READING & WRITING: MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS
    • ISSUE 36: MERCHANT BUILDERS/CLAIRE SCORPO
    • ISSUE 37: BEVERLEY HILLS - HOWARD RATCLIFFE LAWSON "THE ARCHITECT WHO BUILDS"
  • WEEK 11: DETAIL - NAKED AND NAUGHTY
    • ISSUE 38: MAJOR PROJECT AS PRACTICE W/ DHARMAN GERSCH
    • ISSUE 39-40: REVENGE ON RED TAPE
    • ISSUE 41: RED TAPE LETTER
  • WEEK 12: DIY LEMONS
    • ISSUE 42-44: #BRUTALIST FILTER
    • ISSUE 45: SHOP THE CITY
    • ISSUE 46: WE CAN BE MORE THAN FRIENDS
  • LOST AND FOUND
  • ANTIFLOG
  • BUYFLOG
SUBMIT TO FLOG
​​D O E S ​  A N Y O N E    H A V E    A N Y   Q U E S T I O N S ?
Picture
Picture
DOWNLOAD

SPONSORED CONTENT

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
​ISSUE 18_#MAKE IT YOURS
        _BY LEWIS MOORE
_SUBJECTS_ #
​

DEAR ARCHITECTURE SCHOOL...
_These are screen-caps of a 2014 advertisement for the Westfield “Miranda” shopping centre.
The music comes in softly at first, a wavering synth that grows louder as white text appears over a deep black background. We see skater Corbin Hariss’ head
silhouetted as the sound of a helicopter’s rotary blades slips into the sound bed.
The music rises as he approaches the destination, swelling as the Westfield logo hoves into view.
Plunged into the mall, we survey Harris, skating down empty corridors and
promenades. Carving through deserted car-parks Hariss’ clothing billows summoning to mind some manga styled mythical hero. When the footage fades to
black we are left with the Westfield logo and the tag line “#makeityours”.
The inspiring and uplifting tone of the bulk of the video sits uncomfortably with the opening text:
“Exclusive access was given for one night only...
…and will never happen ever again.”
This advert seems to represent the apotheosis of a stream of double-think that malls and shopping centres everywhere make their business perpetuating. A desire
to have us read private as public and respond with a similar ease and familiarity, while simultaneously obeying the extra-legal pronouncements of an entirely alien
space.
While the standard forbidding of skateboarding hardly strikes at the heart of our civil rights this video speaks to a disparity between perception and reality which
is rife within the conception of malls, and which if left unchecked will have serious ramifications for the state of our city.
Shopping centre codes of conduct, while seeming petty, enforce a wide range of behaviours in addition to banning “running, skating (including ‘Heelys’), rollerblading, skateboarding, riding a bicycle, scooter or Segway”. This code also
prevents “congregating and loitering in groups of three or more”, specifies clothing
standards (including a prohibition on hoods) and outlaws any “non sponsored” activity or activity that impinges on the “commercial functions” of the centre*.
While it may not be unreasonable to enforce a code of conduct in a shop these spaces are something quite different, due simply to their scale. Privatised shopping
corridors now occupy almost half of the city blocks between Swanston and Elizabeth Streets and La Trobe and Flinders.
This is a region of increasing size where codes are not constructed piece-meal but rolled out, homogeneously, through an entirely inwardly focused realm. Creating a
huge portion of our city-centre no longer primarily under the control of democratic law, enforced by a publicly run police force, but a privately ordained law, exercised
for commercial ends and enforced by privately hired security teams.
These centres represent a dead zone of true civic space in which rights, such as
the right to protest are repeatedly impinged upon. In QV in July 2011 people protesting outside the Max Brenner chain were driven out at the behest of centre management. While this may seem insignificant, raising the question: ‘why
can’t the protest just take place somewhere else?’, the increasing scale of these developments renders this highly problematic as we have seen internationally.
to the extent that it has arguably become the social and commercial centre of the state. Accordingly Black Lives Matter protesters chose it as a place to demonstrate.
In this case, despite the failure of the mall to stop the protest with a court order the protesters were again driven out and several arrested.
The right to protest can only be legitimate if these protests can happen in a public forum and when that public forum increasingly shifts into a private realm we are
effectively stripped of that right.
These centres represent a real and present danger to civic life of which protest is just the most overt part. As the Melbourne Central/Emporium/Myers
agglomeration cements itself within our city it will continue to monopolise metropolitan activity dragging money and people from all corners of the city. We
must remain vigilant and not be won over by stirring music and saccharine hashtags.
#makeityours
.
.
.
(1) Excerpts from the Westfield Code of Conduct
abclocal.go.com/images/wtvg/CodeofConductposter.pdf

RIGHT OF REPLY
[WESTFIELD] CODE OF CONDUCT
westfield_codeofconductposter.pdf
File Size: 539 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

_SUBMIT SUGGESTED
​CITATI0NS
    [object Object]
SUBMIT
 © FLOG PUBLICATIONS, DIGITAL ADDRESS, 2016-2021 EMAIL: submittoflog@gmail.com
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.